So, the distinction would arise where flippantly, toxically pro-defederating behavior -- often jettisoning context, overstating associations, summarily characterizing people, even crafting specious connections that deliberately preserve conflict and political goal orientation through potential resolution points -- endeavors to spread itself as broadly as possible using public moderation collaboration tools like # fediblock. Its power translates well; you can take the Poster out of Twitter, but…
This makes no implications of instances with moderation regimes that fit their own particular needs, or see themselves as networking differently; every instance needn't seek the most connectivity possible. There is every reason to maintain a portion of the network that is defederated with mastodon .social, the largest instance, because maximal connection is not even desirable to many people with every right to use AP how they want. It's just a collective material requirement to improve the net.
If an instance has got fifty people on it who interact a lot with each other, and one of them is a miserable piece of shit, well, if the instance doesn't repel them, it's a lot easier to see 50 people having personal responsibility for failing to consider the behavior of a member they almost certainly know, than it would be to hold 5,000 or 50,000 people responsible (blocked and inaccessible to your users) for the moderation team's decisions about a person they may never have any connection to.
If your instances become so large that it's impossible to hold everyone on the instance responsible for one member's behavior (so, probably literally anything more than a couple hundred users max, unless you build an impressive participatory governance), you will end up with torches out for moderation because pretty much any outcome will result in at least some people being held responsible for someone they simply cannot be expected to build and leverage corrective social structures towards.
I'm generally against no-trust systems, as an ideological pursuit, but building your systems toward outcomes that would otherwise be reliant on good individual behavior can get a lot of important things done with minimal risk or imposition. This is why I feel large instances are unsustainable on this platform. Sharing an instance with another person -- anyone -- means sharing liability for that person with all the other users. It's not just about moderation; instance blocks silence everyone.
@moderation It is all of our responsibility to reject knee-jerk association politics now before it prematurely destroys this platform.
Let nothing I say be misconstrued for any defense of some distant, typically-mediocre, flippantly racist white actor whose additional account Kolektiva promptly froze pending further investigation, and which they've said absolutely nothing to defend, either.
Big shouts to @moderation maintaining a principled professionalism and critical transparency in the face of seemingly incessant bad-faith solidarity-destroying opportunistic behavior flying in all directions. It's not easy to make thorough and sustainable decisions in a space now jammed with people used to operating with the cynicism seemingly required to obtain results with a central authority deeply uninterested in the actual details of an event.
My tool for making a simple, searchable, themeable archive of your public tweets and threads is now live:
https://tinysubversions.com/twitter-archive/make-your-own/
The tool runs entirely on your computer, in your browser. None of your data is uploaded anywhere in the process. The output is a zip file of a basic HTML website that you can upload to a web host if you choose.
The site also answers most of the common questions I get. Please read it first before asking me questions here!
Just weeks into the influx, # Fediblock is already railroading people through chains of association politics… as much as I wish I could just block the hashtag we should all be persistently aware of how miserable the situation will become if we don't get over ourselves and commit to building solidarity community right now. We should take responsibility right now, to the best of our ability, and advantage—maybe not always engaging those particular horrors themselves, but building better at home.
I keep procrastinating rebuilding the lunchboxes and it ends now! Live at 10pm. https://twitch.tv/bobbyd0g
I keep seeing that “first they came for the journalists” sign, and it pisses me off so much, because when they came for muslims, immigrants, and trans people, mainstream journalists normalized it and reported it as “both sides”. Somehow it didn’t count for them until it was happening to them personally, which is *exactly* what the fucking poem was warning against in the first place.
Call of Duty is a government psyop: These documents prove it
A close inspection of Activision Blizzard’s key staff and their connections to state power, and documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, reveal that Call of Duty is a carefully constructed piece of military propaganda, designed to advance the interests of the US national security state.
https://therealnews.com/call-of-duty-is-a-government-psyop-these-documents-prove-it
Producing Transdermal Estrogen: A Do-It-Yourself Guide
https://crimethinc.com/estrogen
In this report, a small collective details how they produced and distributed transdermal estrogen using reproducible do-it-yourself methods. This is an experiment aimed at securing the agency and autonomy of everyone who seeks gender self-determination.
Scrappy queer