(You miss dunking? Have some dunk, Rich!) Move over dumbasses, here come the identitarian white liberals to show you how Mastodon should be done!!! and pave the way for minorities!! Thank goodness Black people have this unbidden pack of crackers doing vanguard service to accurately and faithfully advance their causes! To bring back … quote tweets, the healthiest feature on Twitter! What we're really missing on this website is maximum conflict.

@bobbyd0g i will just point out that

- japanese mastodon instances have quote tweets for years
- misskey has had quote tweets for years
- pleroma has had quote tweets since 2020

this entire debate is stupid and a waste of everyone's time

@ariadne @bobbyd0g This feels like the emote reactions back and forth on forums of yesteryear whose social problems boiled down to being an active moderation issue rather than a structural flaw of the mechanic.

I really hate how indiscriminate of quoting a "retweet" is but in a place with no global text search (and after hearing the perspectives of other treehouse users) I think having an implementation is better than none at all.

@ariadne @bobbyd0g I know neither the protocol or the software but I hope such an implementation can ditch the behavioral loop english twitter developed whenever the quoted text isolated in full from the commentary choosing to quote it.

Follow

@conte @ariadne If the network continued to reject and effectively repel broad search, the deleterious effects of QTs would be greatly reduced from the original functionality on Twitter. However I believe we should always *consider* the way we build our systems as erecting incentive structures for users that may or may not be conducive to healthy social connection. You'll never catch me claiming QTs have no positive value, only that they can and do harm.

@bobbyd0g @conte network-wide search is largely too expensive to implement using off-the-shelf software. that alone will stop it from being widely adopted.

@ariadne @conte There's plenty of reason to believe that invasive capital-driven systems will find ways to start mapping, monitoring, and interconnecting the network without us, so "effectively repel" continues to be a commitment required

@bobbyd0g @conte those systems have existed, and will continue to exist, sadly. it is why i recommend not using public relays, that's where scrapers get most of their data.

@bobbyd0g @ariadne That's the reason why I think a quote system that eschews the behavioral loop is better than none at all at this point, because any attempt by the user to redo it (screenshot, text copying) reintroduces the context, provenance, or reading flow isolation that encourages this behavior in the first place. Scraping is inevitable no matter how hard we run from it, but we can prevent the hands of vice from linking arms by intercepting it with a healthier ui. Hopefully.

@bobbyd0g @conte for example, in pleroma, free text search queries can take *minutes* to complete. enabling search in mastodon requires elasticsearch, which costs gigabytes of ram. misskey search has similar costs to pleroma.

@ariadne@social.treehouse.systems @bobbyd0g@mastodon.hellsite.net @conte@social.treehouse.systems I don't think misskey does proper full text search without elasticsearch, just basic matches, which are tolerable (the few times I used it, ~5s or so).

@bobbyd0g @ariadne I don't like using the broad term harm, if we want to discuss the ramifications lets be specific as to what QRTs perpetuated in english speaking conversations: Contextless dogpiling. The proposed quote toot already has a better foundation to avoid this.

Message limits are longer so its harder to misplace the original speaker's context as a writer or a reader without exposing yourself as a bad faith actor. We, and other well managed instances have actual moderation and administrative communication to nix such cascades in the bud should they happen. And lastly, the critical mass of any given flood post is much higher since follower timelines have no engagement prioritization.

Conversely, the QRTing format itself encourages this behavior in a few ways that mastodon doesn't fix if its ported wholesale, the most egregious being prefixing the QRT to the quoted content rather than the other way around. Really, anything that further isolates quoted post content from the flow of reading an adversarial reply primes a reader for the offensive, so UI integration and control over what part of a post the QRT'r is quoting is necessary for a healthy implementation.

@conte @bobbyd0g

agreed that any QRT implementation should function more similarly to Tumblr than Twitter (e.g. response on bottom.)

I built such a system in Jejune, and I plan to port the UX over to Mastodon in our fork and see how people like it.

@conte @ariadne This post alone is more valuable than pretty much everything else i've seen on this subject put together

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Hellsite

The hell site